COWBOYS MOCK DRAFT GRADE B-

6,0 B-

URL 60-4323

Letter grade with a four-component score, written analysis, and a pick-by-pick breakdown for every selection in this saved mock.

My Mock Drafts →
Grade another draft →
B-

Dallas Cowboys

More right than wrong for the Cowboys, and a B- to prove it.

by psicosis6878yahoocom · 2024 NFL Draft · 7 picks · 0 steals · 2 reaches
Value C+
Need B+
Trades B-
Future B-

There is reaching, and then there is Curtis Jacobs at slot 124. The Cowboys jumped the board by 51 and dared it to prove them wrong.

A whole weekend of picks and wide receiver is somehow still a want. On the needs board they went 2 of 8, with cornerback the one that mattered most. The back end got a real overhaul.

In sum, a sturdy weekend with one asterisk, the wide receiver spot they never got to.

Pick-by-Pick

R1.24 · Pick 24 · Kool-Aid McKinstry · CB · rank 19
In the Round 1 slot they get a potential shutdown corner. The biggest hole, addressed.
R2.24 · Pick 56 · Edgerrin Cooper · LB · rank 59
They paid sticker price for Edgerrin Cooper in the 56th pick, and that is fine. The one spot they could not leave alone, and did not.
R3.24 · Pick 87 · Tommy Eichenberg · LB · rank 125
A wild overpay on Tommy Eichenberg in pick No. 87, the sort that defines a class for the wrong reasons. It also answers one of the loudest questions on the roster.
R4.24 · Pick 124 · Curtis Jacobs · LB · rank 175
They talked themselves into Curtis Jacobs at pick 124, and the board did not agree. They walked in needing this and walked out with it.
R5.38 · Pick 174 · Michael Barrett · LB · rank 180
They took Michael Barrett at par in No. 174, which is nothing to complain about. Top of the wish list, and they did not leave without it.
R6.37 · Pick 212 · Daequan Hardy · CB · rank 217
A straight-up fair deal on Daequan Hardy at the 212th overall pick, value and slot in agreement. A must-fix position, and they treated it like one.
R7.25 · Pick 245 · Dwight McGlothern · CB · rank 249
Dwight McGlothern in pick No. 245 is exactly on the number, no argument either way. This was priority one on the needs board, and now it is handled.