Quay Davis WR Southern | NFL Draft Profile & Scouting Report
Quay Davis WR Southern
NFL Draft Profile & Scouting Report
| ROLE: Outside X-Receiver | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Updated: 09/21/2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Draft Year: 2025 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 40 time: 4.55 seconds (33%*) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Age: 22.1 DOB: 10/29/2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
SHARE THIS PROFILE:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ROLE: Outside X-Receiver | |
| Last Updated: 09/21/2024 | |
| Draft Year: 2025 | |
| 40 time: 4.55 seconds (33%*) | |
| Age: 22.1 DOB: 10/29/2002 | |
|
SHARE THIS PROFILE:
|
| Overall Rating: | 66.0 / 100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating of opposition Defense player has faced | ||
| Defense Rating: |
|
52% |
| Click the links below to view how player ranks vs other prospects. | ||
| QB Rating When targeted: | 67.2 | |
| Hands: |
|
58% |
| Short Receiving: |
|
63% |
| Intermediate Routes: |
|
64% |
| Deep Threat: |
|
69% |
| Blocking: |
|
64% |
|
DRAFT PROJECTION:
UDFA
Overall Rank:
#424
Position rank:
#58
|
||
| College Games: 26 College Snaps: 992 | ||
ESPN RATING: 81/100
College Combine Results
|
||
|
247 RATING: 92/100
|
||
|
RIVALS RATING: 6.0 (98%)
|
||
| Player Comparison* (Similarity level) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bailey Gaither - San Jose State |
|
82% |
| Tim Jones - Southern Miss |
|
77% |
| Tarik Black - Texas |
|
74% |
Quay Davis percentiles vs other Wide Receiver's (NFL Combine historically - higher value represents better perfomance)
How other scouting services rate Quay Davis (Overall Rank)
All Scouts AverageOverall Rank
528.5
All Scouts AveragePosition Rank
70.0
*Percentile Ranking in Player's Position Group (NFL Combine Historical Data): This percentile reflects how a player's specific statistics rank
in comparison to historical performances at the NFL Combine, specifically within their position group. A higher percentile indicates a better performance.
For instance, being in the 90th percentile for a particular stat means the player outperformed 90% of their peers in that category.
*Similarity Percentage: This percentage is calculated based on a comprehensive analysis of various factors, including height, weight, 40-yard dash times, on-field performance statistics, and overall player rating. The analysis is conducted against our database of draft prospects from 2021 to 2023. This similarity score helps in evaluating how closely a current prospect aligns with past prospects. It is important to note, however, that this score reflects similarities based on college production and attributes, and does not account for eventual success or performance in the NFL.
*Similarity Percentage: This percentage is calculated based on a comprehensive analysis of various factors, including height, weight, 40-yard dash times, on-field performance statistics, and overall player rating. The analysis is conducted against our database of draft prospects from 2021 to 2023. This similarity score helps in evaluating how closely a current prospect aligns with past prospects. It is important to note, however, that this score reflects similarities based on college production and attributes, and does not account for eventual success or performance in the NFL.