Dorian Thomas TE California |
NFL Draft Profile & Scouting Report
| Jersey: #7 ROLE: Slot Receiving TE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Updated: 09/28/2026 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Draft Year: 2027 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FORTY time: 4.72 seconds (65%*) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Age: 21.4 DOB: 05/05/2005 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jersey: #7 | |
| ROLE: Slot Receiving TE | |
| Last Updated: 09/28/2026 | |
| Draft Year: 2027 | |
| Forty time: 4.72 seconds (65%*) | |
| Age: 21.4 DOB: 05/05/2005 | |
| Overall Rating: |
73.7 / 100
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Average rating of opposition Defense player has faced | ||
| Defense Rating: |
|
75% |
| Click the links below to view how player ranks vs other prospects. | ||
| QB Rating When targeted: | 95.6 | |
| Hands: |
|
80% |
| Short Receiving: |
|
70% |
| Intermediate Routes: |
|
77% |
| Deep Threat: |
|
77% |
| Blocking: |
|
51% |
|
DRAFT PROJECTION:
UDFA
Overall Rank:
#411
Position rank:
#15 (TE)
|
||
| College Games: 16 College Snaps: 672 | ||
ESPN RATING: 76/100
|
||
247 RATING: 88/100
|
||
RIVALS RATING: 5.4 (89%)
|
||
| Player Comparison* (Similarity level) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Blake Whiteheart - Wake Forest |
|
75% |
| Caden Prieskorn - Ole Miss |
|
70% |
| Mason Fairchild - Kansas |
|
70% |
Draft Profile: Bio
Thomas spent two mostly special-teams seasons at Arizona before a breakout 2025 at New Mexico, where he caught 56 passes for 560 yards and four touchdowns and earned first-team All-Mountain West, leading all conference tight ends in receiving.He transferred to California for 2026 and landed on the Mackey Award watch list, moving up to the ACC to prove the production travels.
At 6-4 and 239 pounds he is a receiving-first move tight end who went from unknown to all-conference in a single year.
Scouting Report: Strengths
- Proven receiving volume and production in a breakout 2025
- Go-to seam and move-tight-end role with reliable hands
- Ascended from special-teamer to all-conference in one year
- Frame with room to add functional mass
Scouting Report: Weaknesses
- Only one year of high-volume production
- Production came at the Mountain West level
- In-line blocking underdeveloped at 239 pounds
- Must prove it against ACC competition
- Limited track record before 2025
Scouting Report: Summary
Thomas is a receiving move tight end who broke out at New Mexico in 2025, leading Mountain West tight ends in receiving before transferring to California. However, it is one year of high-volume production at the Group-of-5 level, the in-line blocking is underdeveloped, and he has to prove it in the ACC.Overall, Thomas is an ascending, receiving-first tight end whose one-year leap and hands are the draw, with the sample size and blocking the questions. He projects as a developmental move tight end, with the ceiling of a rotational seam target if the Cal tape confirms it and the floor of a depth pass-catcher.
How other scouting services rate Dorian Thomas (Overall Rank)
All Scouts AverageOverall Rank
300.5
All Scouts AveragePosition Rank
15.0
*Percentile Ranking in Player's Position Group (NFL Combine Historical Data): This percentile reflects how a player's specific statistics rank
in comparison to historical performances at the NFL Combine, specifically within their position group. A higher percentile indicates a better performance.
For instance, being in the 90th percentile for a particular stat means the player outperformed 90% of their peers in that category.
*Similarity Percentage: This percentage is calculated based on a comprehensive analysis of various factors, including height, weight, 40-yard dash times, on-field performance statistics, and overall player rating. The analysis is conducted against our database of draft prospects from 2021 to 2023. This similarity score helps in evaluating how closely a current prospect aligns with past prospects. It is important to note, however, that this score reflects similarities based on college production and attributes, and does not account for eventual success or performance in the NFL.
*Similarity Percentage: This percentage is calculated based on a comprehensive analysis of various factors, including height, weight, 40-yard dash times, on-field performance statistics, and overall player rating. The analysis is conducted against our database of draft prospects from 2021 to 2023. This similarity score helps in evaluating how closely a current prospect aligns with past prospects. It is important to note, however, that this score reflects similarities based on college production and attributes, and does not account for eventual success or performance in the NFL.
