Michael Trigg TE Baylor |
NFL Draft Profile & Scouting Report
| Jersey: #1 ROLE: Slot Receiving TE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Updated: 03/06/2026 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Draft Year: 2026 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FORTY time: 4.70 seconds (70%*) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Age: 24.1 DOB: 06/27/2002 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bowl Invite: Senior Bowl | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jersey: #1 | |
| ROLE: Slot Receiving TE | |
| Last Updated: 03/06/2026 | |
| Draft Year: 2026 | |
| Forty time: 4.70 seconds (70%*) | |
| Age: 24.1 DOB: 06/27/2002 | |
| Bowl Invite: Senior Bowl | |
| Overall Rating: | 84.5 / 100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating of opposition Defense player has faced | ||
| Defense Rating: |
|
81% |
| Click the links below to view how player ranks vs other prospects. | ||
| QB Rating When targeted: | 96.8 | |
| Hands: |
|
60% |
| Short Receiving: |
|
82% |
| Intermediate Routes: |
|
86% |
| Deep Threat: |
|
82% |
| Blocking: |
|
56% |
|
DRAFT PROJECTION:
4th
Overall Rank:
#116
Position rank:
#5 (TE)
|
||
| College Games: 37 College Snaps: 1447 | ||
ESPN RATING: 83/100
|
||
247 RATING: 91/100
|
||
RIVALS RATING: 5.9 (97%)
|
||
| Player Comparison* (Similarity level) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sam LaPorta - Iowa |
|
87% |
| Greg Dulcich - UCLA |
|
86% |
| Erick All - Iowa |
|
80% |
Draft Profile: Bio
Michael Trigg was a consensus four-star recruit out of Seffner Christian Academy in Tampa, Florida, where he starred as both a pass-catching tight end and a defensive end, piling up nearly 1,900 all-purpose yards and 29 touchdowns as a senior. He was also a standout basketball player, averaging over 20 points per game as an underclassman. Trigg committed to USC and saw limited action as a true freshman in 2021, catching seven passes for 109 yards and a touchdown across four games.He transferred to Ole Miss as the top-rated tight end in the portal and scored three receiving touchdowns in his first game against Central Arkansas in 2022, setting a school record. Injuries hampered his time in Oxford, and after a redshirt season in 2023 with just four catches, Trigg moved on again to Baylor. His 2024 redshirt junior year produced 30 catches for 395 yards and three touchdowns, earning Second-Team All-Big 12 recognition.
The 2025 season was comfortably his best. Through 11 games, Trigg posted 50 receptions for 694 yards and six touchdowns, including a 155-yard outing against Kansas State that set a Baylor single-game record for tight ends. He also turned heads at the NFL Combine by recording the largest wingspan ever measured at the position.v
Scouting Report: Strengths
- Record-setting wingspan and catch radius create an enormous target window for quarterbacks.
- Moves with real fluidity for his size, sinking his hips and snapping out of breaks cleanly.
- Wins vertically against linebackers who cannot match his speed up the seam.
- Dangerous at every level of the route tree, with his best work coming on intermediate concepts.
- High-points the ball well and extends to make catches outside his frame.
- Good contact balance after the catch, grinding through arm tackles for extra yards.
- Has real speed for the position, enough to stress safeties down the seam on vertical stems.
- Alignment flexibility to line up inline, in the slot, or split wide.
Scouting Report: Weaknesses
- Run blocking is a real problem, with poor pad level and inconsistent hand placement.
- Light frame at 240 pounds limits his ability to anchor against NFL edge setters.
- Too many concentration drops in 2025 after cleaning that up the year before.
- Does not win enough 50/50 balls given his length and catch radius advantage.
- Can get redirected off his route stem by physical press coverage.
- Three schools in five years raises fair questions about consistency and buy-in.
Scouting Report: Summary
What Trigg does best is create problems in space. Line him up in the slot, motion him across the formation, split him out wide on a linebacker, and he will find ways to get open. His route craft and speed at the position make him a real passing game contributor from day one, particularly on seam routes, crossers, and red zone fades where that record wingspan turns into an impossible catch radius for defenders to deal with.The blocking is the hang-up, and it is not a small one. His run blocking actually got worse during his final college season, not better, and at his weight, asking him to hold up inline against NFL defensive ends is a stretch. He will need time in a weight room and a position coach willing to rebuild his technique from the ground up. The concentration drops that showed up in 2025 are also worth watching, because over the course of his career his hands have not been as reliable as you would expect from a player with those physical tools.
The right situation for Trigg is a team with an established tight end already on the roster, where he can develop without pressure to play all three downs immediately. In a complementary role where he runs routes and gets schemed into favorable matchups, there is a useful NFL player here. Whether he becomes more than a situational passing-down weapon depends on whether he commits to the parts of the game that do not show up on highlight reels.
Written By:
Eli Cooper (Big 12)
Michael Trigg percentiles vs other Tight Ends (NFL Combine historically - higher value represents better perfomance)
How other scouting services rate Michael Trigg (Overall Rank)
All Scouts AverageOverall Rank
91.7
All Scouts AveragePosition Rank
6.0
*Percentile Ranking in Player's Position Group (NFL Combine Historical Data): This percentile reflects how a player's specific statistics rank
in comparison to historical performances at the NFL Combine, specifically within their position group. A higher percentile indicates a better performance.
For instance, being in the 90th percentile for a particular stat means the player outperformed 90% of their peers in that category.
*Similarity Percentage: This percentage is calculated based on a comprehensive analysis of various factors, including height, weight, 40-yard dash times, on-field performance statistics, and overall player rating. The analysis is conducted against our database of draft prospects from 2021 to 2023. This similarity score helps in evaluating how closely a current prospect aligns with past prospects. It is important to note, however, that this score reflects similarities based on college production and attributes, and does not account for eventual success or performance in the NFL.
*Similarity Percentage: This percentage is calculated based on a comprehensive analysis of various factors, including height, weight, 40-yard dash times, on-field performance statistics, and overall player rating. The analysis is conducted against our database of draft prospects from 2021 to 2023. This similarity score helps in evaluating how closely a current prospect aligns with past prospects. It is important to note, however, that this score reflects similarities based on college production and attributes, and does not account for eventual success or performance in the NFL.
