Nick Marsh WR Indiana |
NFL Draft Profile & Scouting Report
| Jersey: #6 ROLE: Outside X-Receiver | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Updated: 09/28/2026 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Draft Year: 2027 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FORTY time: 4.38 seconds (88%*) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jersey: #6 | |
| ROLE: Outside X-Receiver | |
| Last Updated: 09/28/2026 | |
| Draft Year: 2027 | |
| Forty time: 4.38 seconds (88%*) | |
| Overall Rating: |
86.2 / 100
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Average rating of opposition Defense player has faced | ||
| Defense Rating: |
|
76% |
| Click the links below to view how player ranks vs other prospects. | ||
| QB Rating When targeted: | 106.8 | |
| Hands: |
|
68% |
| Short Receiving: |
|
71% |
| Intermediate Routes: |
|
80% |
| Deep Threat: |
|
78% |
| Blocking: |
|
65% |
|
DRAFT PROJECTION:
2nd - Late
Overall Rank:
#58
Position rank:
#9 (WR)
|
||
| College Games: 27 College Snaps: 1428 | ||
ESPN RATING: 82/100
|
||
|
247 RATING: 95/100
|
||
|
RIVALS RATING: 5.8 (95%)
|
||
| Player Comparison* (Similarity level) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Terrace Marshall Jr. - LSU |
|
92% |
| Matt Landers - Arkansas |
|
87% |
| Caleb Douglas - Texas Tech |
|
86% |
Draft Profile: Bio
Marsh made an immediate impact at Michigan State, setting the school's true-freshman receiving records in 2024 and leading the Spartans in receiving as a rookie.He led Michigan State in receiving again in 2025 with 58 catches for 662 yards and six touchdowns, though he needed a heavy target volume to get there, then entered the portal as a coveted transfer and landed at Indiana.
He opened his Indiana career with a highlight one-handed touchdown on the offense's first snap of 2026 but settled into a secondary role behind Charlie Becker in a loaded receiver room, seeing limited targets early.
Scouting Report: Strengths
- Big 6-foot-3 boundary target with plus speed to stretch the field
- Threatens vertically and finished with six touchdowns on his 2025 tape
- Dangerous after the catch, pulls away once he is into the open field
- Long strider who eats cushion and gets on top of corners quickly
- Flashed against Big Ten defenses, 85 yards at Maryland and 77 on UCLA
- Willing worker whose frame and traits point to untapped upside
Scouting Report: Weaknesses
- Efficiency lagged the volume, just 662 yards on 97 targets
- Poor contested producer, won only three of eleven tight windows
- Six drops, the hands need to settle for a lead role
- Route detail is unrefined, wins on traits more than craft
Scouting Report: Summary
Marsh is a 6-foot-3 boundary receiver with plus speed who threatens vertically and pulls away once he has the ball in space, and the frame and traits point to untapped upside. However, the production lags the tools: he needed a heavy target volume to reach 662 yards, the contested wins were too few, and he put too many balls on the ground, a sign the route detail and hands have not caught up. He wins on speed and size right now more than craft.Overall, Marsh is a developmental boundary X with starter-caliber tools and real work ahead on the finer points, best in a vertical offense that schemes him clean releases, and Curt Cignetti's Indiana has a record of developing receivers. He projects as a developmental Day 2 receiver, with the ceiling of a starting outside X and the floor of a traits-based depth piece and special-teamer.
How other scouting services rate Nick Marsh (Overall Rank)
All Scouts AverageOverall Rank
35.2
All Scouts AveragePosition Rank
6.0
*Percentile Ranking in Player's Position Group (NFL Combine Historical Data): This percentile reflects how a player's specific statistics rank
in comparison to historical performances at the NFL Combine, specifically within their position group. A higher percentile indicates a better performance.
For instance, being in the 90th percentile for a particular stat means the player outperformed 90% of their peers in that category.
*Similarity Percentage: This percentage is calculated based on a comprehensive analysis of various factors, including height, weight, 40-yard dash times, on-field performance statistics, and overall player rating. The analysis is conducted against our database of draft prospects from 2021 to 2023. This similarity score helps in evaluating how closely a current prospect aligns with past prospects. It is important to note, however, that this score reflects similarities based on college production and attributes, and does not account for eventual success or performance in the NFL.
*Similarity Percentage: This percentage is calculated based on a comprehensive analysis of various factors, including height, weight, 40-yard dash times, on-field performance statistics, and overall player rating. The analysis is conducted against our database of draft prospects from 2021 to 2023. This similarity score helps in evaluating how closely a current prospect aligns with past prospects. It is important to note, however, that this score reflects similarities based on college production and attributes, and does not account for eventual success or performance in the NFL.